![]() |
Ethnographic
Film - How to Discover Another Taiwan Through Independent Documentary |
![]() “Something’s Just Not Right” Ever get the feeling when flicking through Taiwan television that you’re not seeing the full picture? That what is being focused on isn’t the real Taiwan? ... Endless talk-shows gossiping about mundane urban topics as experienced by ‘Taipei city residents,’ repetitive game and fashion shows - and when it comes to news - ‘reporters’ with frantic, fake female voices (the Taiwan ‘doll voice’ phenomena) who cannot possibly be taken seriously, as they hype-up and sensationalize fatal road crashes, murders and other daily tragedies. Fortunately, there are avenues in which both Taiwanese and the international audience can learn about ‘another Taiwan,’ - a Taiwan that seldom gets access to mainstream commercial media. The resulting viewing experience is authentic, organic and often richly rewarding. All one need do, is visit some of the alternative cinemas that are scattered across Taipei - from Ximen to Neihu - and be on the lookout for documentary films (usually with English subtitles) made by independent and often indigenous local directors. Here, we meet three such people: Hung-Ching Tseng, Futuru Tsai and Kevin Lee, find out about their latest offerings, and also get a behind the scenes close-up of Taiwan independent documentary film. Hung-Ching Tseng (pictured right) Unlike other documentaries (particularity those seen on ‘Discovery’ and ‘National Geographic’) that usually use studio voice-over as a mediator for telling the stories of others, Tseng took great care to allow the main characters (including their friends) to tell their own story. In documentary theory, this is referred to as the ‘fly-on-the-wall’ or ‘observational mode,’ and is no doubt the most appropriate for ethnographic film documentary. However, getting real-life character’s to tell their story means that this mode usually takes many more months of location work and as such, a huge amount of film stock and editing time. Also, in the three years it took to make, other story events were ‘naturally’ introduced that threatened to overtake or unbalance the original backdrop of the story, as Tseng explains - “I had always known of the strong ramifications of WTO
membership and how it affected Taiwan tobacco growing; it has been
like a ghost hovering over the life of tobacco farmers for a long
time . . . But during production, we had Typhoon Morakot, causing
the biggest disaster and loss of harvest that farmers had ever seen
in their lives . . . So from a storytelling viewpoint, it becomes
a big job to weave all these events into an overall account of the
challenges that farmers face. For example, resulting mudslides (from
floods) were a big problem that began after the Japanese colonial
government cleared so much hillside land of trees. These new story
events lead to other events, and we go deeper and deeper into history.”
|
When asked how he and his expensive equipment survived
absolutely torrential typhoon conditions, Tseng laughed and said,
“I put up an umbrella - a very strong one.” Essential
and standard video equipment has little protection from natural elements;
the waterproof camera jackets often inhibit the operator’s ability
to reach important controls that adjust light settings and also, in
Taiwan’s humidity, tend to cause too much condensation. What
this means is that there is a constant physical and mental struggle
to protect equipment, while aiming to catch that all important story
element. Then there is the physical and emotional toll on the human
body. Tseng could have just as easily not taken on this challenging
and hugely time-consuming side project and been content with his regular
monthly roster and salary. But like so many people in the documentary
world, for him, this is clearly a labor of love . . . Tseng says that during production, not one of his
subjects ever expressed a desire to get any personal message across
to the external audience . . . He says that Taiwan farmers accept
that they are “just farmers” and were willing to be filmed
living their regular lives; nobody he says “wanted to be a star”
. . . The premiere was in a local village in Meinong - in a tobacco
shed. In attendance to witness three years of filming were 500 locals,
including all the people featured in the documentary. All agreed that
the production depicted how life really was, and remains. Like all
producer/cameramen/directors interviewed, Tseng feels as if he is
preserving important history about people, and making recordings that
can act as evidence for both policy and research . . . Although the
WTO price regulations were a backdrop included for current analysis,
he says the future value of the documentary will be its ethnographic
role, being a detailed recording of relationships between people and
how they - as a group - get though “financial hardship, grief,
suffering and so on” . . . Tseng says this documentary is like
“a record of many moments in time.” In The New Flood, which took two years to make, Tsai takes parts of the flood legend, connecting them to the progression and effects of Morakot, including rebuilding and other stages of recovery. It was obviously a difficult task combining an old work of fiction with a modern day disaster, and the film does not use any real narration. Instead cultural beliefs, feelings and modern events are told by retelling the legend against the pictures of Morakot. But, as Tsai explains, the documentary nearly didn’t happen, due to his typhoon volunteer commitments - Click HERE for page 2 |
||